Phase 2, open-label trial: PK findings in stable liver transplant patients*,2,7

Patients were converted from Prograf® twice daily to ENVARSUS® PA once daily on Day 8 of the study.

Tacrolimus trough levels remained stable throughout the study periods

Mean whole blood concentration of Prograf®at Day 7 and ENVARSUS® PA at days 14 and 21*

graph of mean whole blood concentration of Prograf® at Day 7 and ENVARSUS® PA at Days 14 and 21

Adapted from Alloway et al.

PK parameters that showed statistically significant differences between
ENVARSUS® PA and Prograf®(p<0.001)*,‡,2,7

PK parameters that showed statistically significant differences between ENVARSUS® PA and Prograf®

Adapted from Alloway et al.

Correlation between AUC24 and Cmin showed numerically higher values for ENVARSUS® PA on Days 14 and 21 compared to Prograf®on Day 7, but the difference was not statistically significant*,2,7

Correlation between AUC24 and Cmin showed numerically higher values for ENVARSUS® PA on Days 14 and 21 compared to Prograf® on Day 7, but the difference was not statistically significant

Adapted from Alloway et al.

PK: pharmacokinetic; Cmax: maximum concentration; Tmax: time of the maximum concentration; AUC24: area under the curve at 24 hours; Cmin: minimum concentration; Cavg: average concentration

*Clinical significance is unknown.

†Comparative clinical significance is unknown.

‡The data are reported as arithmetic means and standard deviations.

§The fluctuation is the degree of plasma concentration fluctuation during the dosing interval with respect to Cavg (i.e. 100 × [Cmax–Cmin]/Cavg).

¶The swing is the degree of plasma concentration swing during the dosing interval with respect to Cmin (i.e. 100 × [Cmax–Cmin]/Cmin).

**The data are reported as medians with minimums and maximums in parentheses.